Borders
were magic when I was a kid. They were
the deepest mystery of any road trip. Driving
south from our hometown in Minnesota, my parents would warn my sister and me
when we were approaching the border, so that we would be ready for this transcendent
moment, a break in the monotony of hours in the car. The sign marking the border approached,
getting larger, appearing to accelerate toward us, until it zoomed past the
car, and then, not knowing exactly when, we would be in an entirely new place. There was something exotic about the Iowan
cornfields compared to our native Minnesotan ones. The quality of the interstate improved
noticeably, and the license plates of neighboring cars were unrecognizable.
Like all
childhood magics, this magic wore off, and, by the world-weary age of ten I understood
that state borders in the midwest were meaningless. Sometimes crossing a border involved a bridge
over a river, which was about as exciting as it got.
My
obsession with world geography kept my fascination with borders alive for a while. The stark difference between the
Soviet and post-Soviet era globes, and the dispute over the Kashmir region between
India, China and Pakistan all provided interesting border trivia for me. More importantly, I imagined that when one
crossed an international border, the stark differences of the cultures were
always immediately apparent. Borders
between countries, unlike those between states, actually meant something.
But even
this conviction began to wear down with time.
I learned that the borders of many countries were blurry. Dialects, accents, ethnicities, and customs
change across geography without regard for borders; two communities on either
side of a border are often more similar to one another than they are to the
cultural capital of their respective countries.
The Basque and
Catalan peoples of northern Spain and Southern France are an example of groups who
occupy two countries but are in some ways nations of their own, with their own
languages and cultures. Other examples
with less historical and political turmoil exist as well, like the Tai people
of southern China and northern Laos and Vietnam. Borders between these countries feel like
mere formalities, with few restrictions on comings and goings across the
border,
After
learning that even international borders weren't always powerful enough to
neatly separate peoples and cultures, I was truly jaded. What was the point of memorizing all of those
political maps that I had obsessed over?
Why did the world have to be so nuanced?
How could I ever hope to understand people and geography?
I got over
this disappointment eventually, and realized that it's impossible to have a
perfect understanding of the world. I even
began to enjoy the knowledge that borders are just socially instituted norms,
and I felt wise for knowing it. So when
I went on a trip last year to the border between China and Myanmar in the small
city of Ruili, I knew not to be too hopeful about glimpsing a Myanmar that was
vastly different than the tropical parts of southwest China that I had already seen. I expected to travel through a subtle
gradient of culture on my way to the city, see some signs of cultural mixing,
but ultimately find that Chinese cultural influence had chipped away at
anything too "other".
But the
border checkpoint I found separated two worlds.
On my side, the Chinese side, were generic department store buildings like
those you would see in any Chinese city, with duty free shops selling Louis
Vitton and expensive jade. Taxis circled
a roundabout and Chinese tourists milled about.
The checkpoint itself was an imposing building with Communist insignia. And peering through the gates, behind that
building I saw unfamiliar architecture, drab white apartment buildings, Burmese
people in sarong-like clothes speaking Burmese. Suddenly I felt something like the feeling I
had as a child, zooming through cornfields after just entering Iowa, a rush of
excitement and wonder that I hadn't expected to ever feel again, because I had
learned that that's not how the world actually works.
A vain
attempt at a metal barrier branched out from the checkpoint building, marking
the border. Burmese children stared out at me from the other side, and one
darted out towards me. He gave some kind
of greeting, and suddenly was on his knees, his hands folded one over another
in the universal sign of a plea for money, and before I knew it he had grabbed
ahold of my leg and wouldn't let go. Dazed
and with no way to communicate, I leaned over, gently shook his shoulder and
croaked "no". As I bent over,
my sunglasses fell from my shirt where they had been hanging. He grabbed them and was gone.
The scene
felt like a cliché; white male's brief brush with "South Asia",
complete with aggressive child beggar.
And part of me liked that, the child in me that wants borders to be meaningful
and the world to make sense and be simple, and, embarrassingly, for people of different
cultures to reinforce my internalized stereotypes of them.
Naturally,
the college-educated-liberal-millennial in me didn't like the scene very much
at all, with all of the loaded colonial implications. Walking away, I felt like I shouldn't be at
the checkpoint, that I was seeing something someone wouldn't want me to... the
clear poverty of Myanmar likely had something to do with that, as well as the
fact that this border was not well patrolled for the illegal trafficking that
makes it famous in China.
But I think
I was most uncomfortable with the picture I had just seen. I didn't know how to feel about a border
that, while porous, also seemed to segregate two places so thoroughly, and that
seemed to embody a clear power dynamic between the two countries. What did it mean for the lives of the people
living on either side, and their ability to communicate with and understand one
another? I had found a border that
filled me with wonder and curiosity, and it was ugly.
No comments:
Post a Comment